Search for: "Interscope Records, et al v. Does"
Results 1 - 8
of 8
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2008, 9:14 am
Lloyd Cause: 17:501 Copyright Infringement Filed: March 27, 2008 Interscope Records et al v. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 9:13 am
Does 1-40, in Tampa, Florida, has been granted, based upon the RIAA's improper service of the subpoena.The following is the court's docket entry: The following transaction was entered on 9/25/2007 at 3:55 PM EDT and filed on 9/25/2007 Case Name: Interscope Records et al v. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 2:31 am
District Courts for the Eastern or Western District of Arkansas was chosen as the forum for litigating the following case(s), as published by Justia: Arista Records LLC et al v. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 3:52 pm
District Courts for the Eastern or Western District of Arkansas was chosen as the forum for litigating the following case(s), as published by Justia: Virgin Records America Inc et al v. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 3:15 am
Vita Tkach et al, in the U.S. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 6:09 am
For example, in Interscope Records v. [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 2:00 am
Maverick Recording Company et al v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general… [read post]
